#7140140 - 06/21/13 05:05 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
Huggy
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 11/01/99
Posts: 42871
Loc: Cincinnati, OH
|
Most excellent photo salty. As usual really... but that is one of my top 3 you've shared.
_________________________
Kevin - Owner and Driver of Cars -
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7140625 - 06/22/13 12:03 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
ewraven
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/30/02
Posts: 43566
Loc: Dept. of Ruminant Procurement
|
Got the good old Nex-3 out and attached my 30 dollar Polaroid wide angle adapter to the 18-55mm lens. I normally would have cropped the vignetting out of this image, but I like how it turned out...
![](http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7455/9103820161_7231f82dd2_c.jpg) Polaroid wide angle adapter -2 by ewraven, on Flickr
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7140741 - 06/22/13 07:42 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: ewraven]
|
trench301
Post Master
Registered: 02/16/03
Posts: 2785
|
From the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall:
![](http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8535/8641002531_0b357abe9d_b.jpg) 13 Vietnam Wall by Trench301, on Flickr
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7140827 - 06/22/13 10:37 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: trench301]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 107631
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
I would have increased the DOF a bit more on that shot.
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7141029 - 06/22/13 01:57 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
trench301
Post Master
Registered: 02/16/03
Posts: 2785
|
I wanted to see what 1.4 looked like. I thought it was a neat effect. Everyone takes shots of the wall dead on with all the names clear...Guess that's what makes photography an art?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7141318 - 06/22/13 07:55 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: chef]
|
Nate047
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/03/03
Posts: 28558
Loc: La La Land, CA
|
the canvas looks great! i've been wanting to print the mars panorama for my father in law, might have to do it in sections like that Remove thine own self from this image kind sir. Nate ![cool](/images/graemlins/default/cool.gif) no dude, that's an alien
![](http://images.starpulse.com/news/bloggers/684225/blog_images/the-x-files.jpg)
I don't think so.
Nate
_________________________
natehasslerphoto.comFlickrFacebook"Nate047 > NateSTL" - TenTwelve "As long as I have a face, you'll always have a place to sit." - SlowBlackCar *insert picture of stock Fit here*
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7141588 - 06/23/13 12:29 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Nate047]
|
trench301
Post Master
Registered: 02/16/03
Posts: 2785
|
Tonight's supermoon. 100-400L w/2x telecon on 6D. Cropped.
![](http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3744/9112217995_64e5cd9bee_b.jpg) SuperMoon by Trench301, on Flickr
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7141593 - 06/23/13 01:09 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: trench301]
|
ewraven
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/30/02
Posts: 43566
Loc: Dept. of Ruminant Procurement
|
Very nice Trench301. I'm glad I wasn't the only one snapping away at the Moon tonight. Only thing I recommend is that you should try converting that to Black&White, I think you'll be surprised at the result.
For this picture of the Super Moon, I got out my Orion XT6 telescope and connected my NEX-3 to it using a T-mount adapter. This was the first night I had seriously tried this. After 170 pictures, I finally got the hang of it. lol
The sky was cloudy and it is humid tonight. I tried using a purpose built Moon filter but it did nothing, the moon was surrounded by a Halo. I then put on a Neutral Density filter and what a difference, it was like the clouds weren't even there.
You really don't realize how fast the Moon moves across the sky till you look at it in a telescope. My telescope doesn't have a tracking mount, I had to rely on high shutter speeds and high ISO due to the motion blur. Even then, the pictures are a little blurry.
This picture is one of the better ones, it is uncropped.
![](http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7349/9112342403_d9d3a7d665_c.jpg) Moon through Orion XT6 telescope-1 by ewraven, on Flickr
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7141690 - 06/23/13 08:31 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: ewraven]
|
Sir Salty A F
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 01/24/12
Posts: 15608
Loc: Utah
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7141801 - 06/23/13 10:23 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
trench301
Post Master
Registered: 02/16/03
Posts: 2785
|
Better? I think so. I need to figure out how to dial up the blacks to despeckle around the moon. But other than that, thanks for the suggestion! I am still learning...and appreciate any advice. This is FUN!
![](http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7359/9118057086_1db3c3f681_b.jpg) SuperMoonV2 by Trench301, on Flickr
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7142488 - 06/23/13 11:04 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: ewraven]
|
Sir Salty A F
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 01/24/12
Posts: 15608
Loc: Utah
|
i gave it a go tonight
Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II Lens Canon 400mm f5.6L Exposure 0.04 sec (1/25) Aperture f/11.0 Focal Length 400 mm ISO Speed 250
![](http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2825/9121575625_7a0b831875_b.jpg)
no stacking for me
Edited by salty (06/23/13 11:04 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7142610 - 06/24/13 07:12 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
trench301
Post Master
Registered: 02/16/03
Posts: 2785
|
Too high an ISO, can you open the aperture, and drop the ISO some?
Unfortunately thats the best I can do on the aperture. I was shooting the 100-400L which at 400mm is a 5.6 aperture lens. With the 2x telecon I lose 2 full stops meaning f/11 is the widest I can go. If I had it to do again, I should have lowered the iso and gone with a slower shutter speed since I was on a tripod, to make it less noisy. Supposed to be another supermoon in July, so I'll try again.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7142744 - 06/24/13 09:05 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Huggy]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 107631
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
Moon was crazy last night, red tinge, looked awesome! Of course I didn't have my camera with me, lol.
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7143090 - 06/24/13 12:23 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: busfare]
|
Nate047
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/03/03
Posts: 28558
Loc: La La Land, CA
|
I heard we're posting moon pictures.
![](http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5339/9128593304_6db64ba290_o.jpg)
Nate
_________________________
natehasslerphoto.comFlickrFacebook"Nate047 > NateSTL" - TenTwelve "As long as I have a face, you'll always have a place to sit." - SlowBlackCar *insert picture of stock Fit here*
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7147648 - 06/26/13 08:34 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: urapnis]
|
Huggy
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 11/01/99
Posts: 42871
Loc: Cincinnati, OH
|
What aperture you shooting at? If you could go a few stops lower and a little higher ISO (I'm guessing ISO200 or 400 you used) might help get the entire body in the focal plane.
I love macro photography, and hate it... because even at f/11 the DOF is so fucking slim.
edit - I do want to say I like the photo a lot.
Edited by Murder (06/26/13 08:34 PM)
_________________________
Kevin - Owner and Driver of Cars -
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7147694 - 06/26/13 08:59 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Huggy]
|
urapnis
Post Master Sr
Registered: 01/25/02
Posts: 6565
Loc: Seoul, South Korea
|
What aperture you shooting at? If you could go a few stops lower and a little higher ISO (I'm guessing ISO200 or 400 you used) might help get the entire body in the focal plane.
I love macro photography, and hate it... because even at f/11 the DOF is so fucking slim.
edit - I do want to say I like the photo a lot.
Thanks. Aperture was somewhere between 5.6-8 IIRC. My lens is a legacy minolta lens so the camera doesn't capture aperture data. ISO was 400 and shutter speed was 1/500. I shoot handheld...and I don't have a macro flash set up. So I've been trying to find the perfect combo of settings that will allow me to use higher shutter speeds to minimize camera shake, as well as the subject not being still.
I'm going to try ISO at 800 next time...I've seen shots at up to 1600 ISO with the Nex 6 that were still pretty sharp without any noticeable noise.
And I am totally with you on the love/hate. I was initially using a 50mm/3.5 macro lens...but the working distance literally an inch if i wanted to get to 1:1..it was impossible to shoot any moving subjects like bugs. I would take like 50+ shots and one would be actually usable. Now I use a 100mm lens...and the added working distance makes all the difference in the world.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7147865 - 06/26/13 10:40 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: urapnis]
|
chef
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 04/27/00
Posts: 23758
Loc: The OC
|
some awesome detail in those! very cool
_________________________
Why choose mac? "Well, huh, might as, might as well ask why is a tree good? Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good?" RRLSi "put that money into a new imac damn it. it's the bomb" jsmonet "This all fuckin' day. Feel the 900MB/sec of glory. It's like a digital money shot all over your face." RRLSi Order my photo prints (New files uploaded)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7147885 - 06/26/13 10:59 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: chef]
|
Sir Salty A F
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 01/24/12
Posts: 15608
Loc: Utah
|
Anyone know anything about exposure blending?
Here's me sightseeing again with no access to a computer. I tried auto exposure bracketing, so I've got 50-60 exposures of this shot
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7147893 - 06/26/13 11:07 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
Nate047
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 03/03/03
Posts: 28558
Loc: La La Land, CA
|
^Awesome shot!
![](http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2851/9149451180_6be7304d74_o.jpg)
Nate
_________________________
natehasslerphoto.comFlickrFacebook"Nate047 > NateSTL" - TenTwelve "As long as I have a face, you'll always have a place to sit." - SlowBlackCar *insert picture of stock Fit here*
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7147945 - 06/26/13 11:45 PM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: Sir Salty A F]
|
chef
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 04/27/00
Posts: 23758
Loc: The OC
|
nah man that's sick. definitely going to be rad.
I dig the truck shot too Nate, just saw it pop up on Flickr.
_________________________
Why choose mac? "Well, huh, might as, might as well ask why is a tree good? Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good?" RRLSi "put that money into a new imac damn it. it's the bomb" jsmonet "This all fuckin' day. Feel the 900MB/sec of glory. It's like a digital money shot all over your face." RRLSi Order my photo prints (New files uploaded)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7148107 - 06/27/13 07:27 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: urapnis]
|
MetalheaD
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 05/15/03
Posts: 28205
Loc: Roanoke, VA
|
What aperture you shooting at? If you could go a few stops lower and a little higher ISO (I'm guessing ISO200 or 400 you used) might help get the entire body in the focal plane.
I love macro photography, and hate it... because even at f/11 the DOF is so fucking slim.
edit - I do want to say I like the photo a lot. Thanks. Aperture was somewhere between 5.6-8 IIRC. My lens is a legacy minolta lens so the camera doesn't capture aperture data. ISO was 400 and shutter speed was 1/500. I shoot handheld...and I don't have a macro flash set up. So I've been trying to find the perfect combo of settings that will allow me to use higher shutter speeds to minimize camera shake, as well as the subject not being still. I'm going to try ISO at 800 next time...I've seen shots at up to 1600 ISO with the Nex 6 that were still pretty sharp without any noticeable noise. And I am totally with you on the love/hate. I was initially using a 50mm/3.5 macro lens...but the working distance literally an inch if i wanted to get to 1:1..it was impossible to shoot any moving subjects like bugs. I would take like 50+ shots and one would be actually usable. Now I use a 100mm lens...and the added working distance makes all the difference in the world.
I don't think I've ever taken a macro shot that I like. It's just not my thing. Respect for those of you that can pull it off this well.
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7148523 - 06/27/13 10:19 AM
Re: Post one random shot *per day*
[Re: MetalheaD]
|
chef
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 04/27/00
Posts: 23758
Loc: The OC
|
_________________________
Why choose mac? "Well, huh, might as, might as well ask why is a tree good? Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good?" RRLSi "put that money into a new imac damn it. it's the bomb" jsmonet "This all fuckin' day. Feel the 900MB/sec of glory. It's like a digital money shot all over your face." RRLSi Order my photo prints (New files uploaded)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: jsmonet, x, 2000SiRacer, Professor Paki
|
|