#6995651 - 04/05/13 09:18 PM
Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
|
NVMYMPGZ
Sr Member
Registered: 05/10/11
Posts: 1058
Loc: White Plains, NY
|
Locked up a few local Heavy Hitters this past week, you guys might enjoy.
The Contenders:
SS Trailblazer: 6.0 fully built stroker motor 80mm turbo @ 9psi 630rwhp and 600+rwtq with low 11's@125mph at the track (trans not shifting 4th that day)
e34 525i 3.2 s52 hg and studs GT4094R RK tuning on low boost
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9e1Pqi4QsAU
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6996065 - 04/06/13 08:48 AM
Re: Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
[Re: NVMYMPGZ]
|
LNXGUY
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 08/06/00
Posts: 108678
Loc: Barrie, Ont,
|
Man those fucking cars move... I really gotta buy something other then TDI's
_________________________
-Bill The GN would OWN you, your children and your children's children. Left foot, right foot, just keep moving!!! -Jeffrey P. Murphy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6996382 - 04/06/13 04:57 PM
Re: Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
[Re: LNXGUY]
|
00Formula
00Formula
Unregistered
|
It looked like the BMW got the jump both races.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6997559 - 04/07/13 07:42 PM
Re: Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
[Re: GB]
|
NVMYMPGZ
Sr Member
Registered: 05/10/11
Posts: 1058
Loc: White Plains, NY
|
I can attest that u would have to be sick in the head to drive that brick faster than 140. Topend sway like whoa
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6998297 - 04/08/13 09:07 AM
Re: Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
[Re: NVMYMPGZ]
|
bren si
Post Master
Registered: 07/22/00
Posts: 2443
Loc: MA
|
Any room for a GT4094R STi ?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7004871 - 04/10/13 11:22 PM
Re: Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
[Re: NVMYMPGZ]
|
Nealoc187
<3
Post Master Supreme
Registered: 05/07/01
Posts: 32535
Loc: Lisle, IL formerly Kalamazoo, ...
|
bmw jumped.
_________________________
95 maxima 11.7 @ 123mph - stock 3.0L tuned by me on 93octane 12.9 @ 104mph - stock 3.5L w/ bolt ons
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7016484 - 04/17/13 04:53 AM
Re: Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
[Re: UglyValiant]
|
NVMYMPGZ
Sr Member
Registered: 05/10/11
Posts: 1058
Loc: White Plains, NY
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7016503 - 04/17/13 06:21 AM
Re: Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
[Re: UglyValiant]
|
NVMYMPGZ
Sr Member
Registered: 05/10/11
Posts: 1058
Loc: White Plains, NY
|
keep trolling your lame vids.
Not sure what your beef is? When you expressed your dreams of building a '...daily driver friendly, mid 12 second truck! :o' it was cool, but now a truck performing above and beyond what that shitbox will ever do is lame?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7025098 - 04/19/13 10:35 PM
Re: Heavy Hitters Hit the Street Turbo SS vs Turbo S52
[Re: UglyValiant]
|
Kick to ze liver
Poster
Registered: 12/24/10
Posts: 339
|
11 second cars/trucks are "heavy hitters"?
Don't get me wrong, that's fast, and both are certainly faster than my junk...but when I think of the "heavy hitters" I know, we're talking vehicles that are street driven and on the fastest end, might touch 7's. One the slower end, a good bet to beat 10's.
Both are cool cars...but unless "heavy hitter" was a pun directed at the trailblazer, I can't accept these as heavy hitters....
Shut up. Your jealousy is showing.
Edited by Kick to ze liver (04/19/13 10:37 PM)
_________________________
05 Type S - I/RH/E/ASP RRC/DC 2.2s/E85/KPRO - 250whp/165wtq Xenocron Tuned
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: auxilary, The Mad Paki
|
|