Page 2 of 5 <12345>
Topic Options
#3520163 - 02/27/09 04:56 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
OnyxEros Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/17/03
Posts: 17517
Loc: Seattle
 Originally Posted By: Euphoric
 Originally Posted By: OnyxEros
a stock b16 in a civic would be lucky to try 90, most mag racers have it high 15's at about 88mph

a stock dsm was consistantly around 15.1 at about 91mph


my turd churned out low 15's @ 90-91 mph years ago. 15.1 @ 91 is fwd ratio shit. not awd
a properly launched awd car pulling a 15.1 would be in the 88 mph range


both of these are mag racing stock times, so your turd can trap higher than mag times, don't you think a dsm can as well?
_________________________
[quote=turbo_guy_fieri][quote=Kuku]Silence is consent[/quote] [/quote]

Top
Videos
#3520204 - 02/27/09 05:16 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Serendipitous]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
 Originally Posted By: Serendipitous
Your turd isn't stock, though. Besides your blatant Honda bias, you aren't that bad. I can think of worse SvA posters.

That's an endorsement!
lol

i had an intake. bone stock header and exhaust. i dont think an intake gives you 3 mph on this thing...

later added a catback.. did nothing for my time or trap. just changed the sound. never did a header. that was the extent of things years ago.

talon = mods and barely quicker from a roll. ive had it for almost a year...
_________________________

Top
#3520246 - 02/27/09 05:46 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
CommonGutterTrash Offline
This user is more useless than a half-baked compost pile.
Post Master Sr


Registered: 09/16/02
Posts: 6437
Loc: Boston MA
_________________________
Craig R.
2000 9-5 Gary Fisher Wagon
1995 850 T-5R
1996 Galant

AIM = gclipse96

Top
#3520651 - 02/27/09 08:38 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
 Originally Posted By: Euphoric
captain save a ho to the rescuuuuuuuuue

stock 14 sec talons are like stock 12 sec fbods


My stock Eclipse (yes it was bone stock down to the never changed air filter) went 15.9 at 98mph back in 2001. With a K&N it went 99mph.

Honestly if your talon is only going low 90mph its not healthy. AWD's have better gearing and should feel much more peppy in the canadian air than a B16 civic. If it is honestly going into boost at 2800 like a stock car and fizzling out at 3800 then the knock sensor is pulling timing. Its an old car, things like this will happen. For a fact, the car in bone stock form should hold 11psi to redline and it should pull well to 6000. You should not feel a need to shift anytime before 6000 if it is pulling well. If its not, then its sick. Its not going to blow up or anything, it just needs a little TLC, like most DSM's out their.

A stock AWD should be trapping mid 90's in all but scorching summer heat. With a crisp evening should be damm near 100mph as my friends and I regularly did back in the day.

Top
#3520710 - 02/27/09 09:03 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: danl]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
 Originally Posted By: danl


My stock Eclipse (yes it was bone stock down to the never changed air filter) went 15.9 at 98mph back in 2001. With a K&N it went 99mph.

Honestly if your talon is only going low 90mph its not healthy. AWD's have better gearing and should feel much more peppy in the canadian air than a B16 civic. If it is honestly going into boost at 2800 like a stock car and fizzling out at 3800 then the knock sensor is pulling timing. Its an old car, things like this will happen. For a fact, the car in bone stock form should hold 11psi to redline and it should pull well to 6000. You should not feel a need to shift anytime before 6000 if it is pulling well. If its not, then its sick. Its not going to blow up or anything, it just needs a little TLC, like most DSM's out their.

A stock AWD should be trapping mid 90's in all but scorching summer heat. With a crisp evening should be damm near 100mph as my friends and I regularly did back in the day.


98 mph? 15.9? 98 mph bone stock? what a crock. coupled with a 15.9...
ive never seen a stock talon come anywhere near those traps ever.
3400lbs ..195 hp..does not compute.

the talon is very healthy actually. how is a car with 7.xx compression out of boost gonna feel more peppy than an n/a car with 10.x comp and tighter gearing. it just isnt. once in boost there is obviously more torch ....
the car holds 11-17 psi , whatever the mbc is set at, though around 17 it sometimes runs into boost cut depending on weather. it runs well.

its been well taken care of.
_________________________

Top
#3521167 - 02/28/09 12:51 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
SpcNA[ZX] Offline
Sr Member


Registered: 12/08/00
Posts: 1218
Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 Originally Posted By: Euphoric
captain save a ho to the rescuuuuuuuuue

stock 14 sec talons are like stock 12 sec fbods


Lolz, except back when there was such a thing as a stock 1G AWD, high 14's were pretty common. but for arguments sake lets go with looooooooooooooooow 15's vs. the Si's more common hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh 15's. Also so I'm clear here, you're comparing an "out of boost" 4G63's powerband to the complete powerband of a B16? Sooooooo then you're talking about response and power from idle to 2600? Ooooh man, what's next are you going to start the DSM in 5th gear and have it race against an Si (SiR in USA jr.) to 100 too?


Edited by SpcNA[ZX] (02/28/09 12:56 AM)
_________________________
'92 Galant VR-4
'93 Nissan 300ZX

Top
#3521190 - 02/28/09 01:00 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: SpcNA[ZX]]
OnyxEros Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/17/03
Posts: 17517
Loc: Seattle
 Originally Posted By: SpcNA[ZX
]
 Originally Posted By: Euphoric
captain save a ho to the rescuuuuuuuuue

stock 14 sec talons are like stock 12 sec fbods


Lolz, except back when there was such a thing as a stock 1G AWD, high 14's were pretty common. but for arguments sake lets go with looooooooooooooooow 15's vs. the Si's more common hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh 15's. Also so I'm clear here, you're comparing an "out of boost" 4G63's powerband to the complete powerband of a B16? Sooooooo then you're talking about response and power from idle to 2600? Ooooh man, what's next are you going to start the DSM in 5th gear and have it race against an Si (SiR in USA jr.) to 100 too?


that reminds me of the VW guys fapping over top gear acceleration of the R32
_________________________
[quote=turbo_guy_fieri][quote=Kuku]Silence is consent[/quote] [/quote]

Top
#3521279 - 02/28/09 02:25 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: OnyxEros]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
daily driven rpm dolt. idle to 4k rpm... of each car.
_________________________

Top
#3521436 - 02/28/09 08:28 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
Euphoric, my car was a FWD. High 15's is fairly normal for such a heavy fwd back then. If you have a MBC on the car and it isn't running 100mph then the car isn't running well. Also don't be hitting more than 14-15psi without a fuel pump, especially in the cold. You pretty much explained to me why your car pukes and dies. You don't want to listen so I won't try to help.
Top
#3522918 - 03/01/09 12:28 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: danl]
progressi Offline
Post Master Sr


Registered: 06/01/01
Posts: 9133
DSMs weigh 3400 lbs? That's more than my Evo weighed!

From the DSM FAQ:
 Quote:

My '90 AWD Talon, with 1-2 gallons of gas, all fluids full + 15-20 lbs of crap in the car, no driver: 3180 lbs


I know this is fact as my bone stock DSM weighed in at 3200 exactly,fully loaded with every option possible-sunroof and leather interior.

Keep up your BS fabrication plant there,Euphy.

And boost doesnt hit til 2800 psi? With a 14B? I think that boost is your crackpipe. You CANT stay out of boost with the stock turbo.

Every now and then you completely go off the deep end. Its really weird.

This thread belongs in the same X files compilation as the one where we had some brainiacs expounding on how low tech the Z06/ZR1 Corvette is.

Redonkulous.

Top
#3522976 - 03/01/09 01:18 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: progressi]
cliff st-clair Offline
Post Master Sr


Registered: 01/03/00
Posts: 6376
Loc: Queens Village, NY
 Originally Posted By: progressi


This thread belongs in the same X files compilation as the one where we had some brainiacs expounding on how low tech the Z06/ZR1 Corvette is.

Redonkulous.


hey... hey... hey... nobody ever said the Z06 and Zr1 or low tech, but they do use low tech drivetrains. If you could point out one thing about those cars' drivetrain that is state of the art then please enlighten this poor soul.
_________________________
03' 350z
04' Mazda 3 s

Top
#3523235 - 03/01/09 07:38 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: cliff st-clair]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
With respect to drivetrain:

Then engine provides an enomorous amount of power for its size and weight. It can truley be called "world class" in this category.

The transaxle is rear mounted. Again this is a departure from the norm.

I guess state of the art is 1 step back for some people. Like a top heavy, extremely tall B18 that produces the highest hp/liter of any production engine like the integra was touted in the 90's. Who cares? Its heavy, its hard to fit under a low hoodline in any configuration that makes power (compare a corvettes hoodline for a 500+hp z06 to an integra).

Top
#3524260 - 03/01/09 04:55 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: danl]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
 Originally Posted By: danl
Euphoric, my car was a FWD. High 15's is fairly normal for such a heavy fwd back then. If you have a MBC on the car and it isn't running 100mph then the car isn't running well. Also don't be hitting more than 14-15psi without a fuel pump, especially in the cold. You pretty much explained to me why your car pukes and dies. You don't want to listen so I won't try to help.


ya the high 15's is fine. 99 mph is complete bullshit. if the car truly trapped 99 mph it wouldve been low low 14's easily....

stock not happening.
car has mbc and fuel pump with rewire. car runs quite well, compression is good, parts are good. its been taken care of...infact it was under tapp auto care for a long time... a great dsm shop...or at least they used to be. they have kind of moved on a bit from that though they still have dsm guys around...
ive told you about the car before over pm danl...(not that i expect you to remember all that info).



even still 3200lbs(oo i was off by 200 lbs) and 195 hp doesnt = 99 traps stock. just doesnt.
_________________________

Top
#3524622 - 03/01/09 07:11 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
Whatever. I can't prove it to you because I don't know of any stock DSM's anymore and I don't have any videos of when I was stock anyways.
Top
#3525678 - 03/02/09 03:21 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: danl]
stickaz_old Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/04/01
Posts: 56459
Loc: Nor Cal, Hella hurr durr
dont give up! mag race w/archives! i just know we'll get a winner here!
_________________________
Swim->Bike->Cry
"I can see that nurses head bobbing around going "I AINT CANCELIN MUH PLANS, FUCK A CDC. WHO DEY ANYWAY NAH MEEN? IMA GO SEE MUH BOO" -johnso


Top
#3525680 - 03/02/09 03:30 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: stickaz_old]
stickaz_old Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 02/04/01
Posts: 56459
Loc: Nor Cal, Hella hurr durr
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=103709
motortrend got a 14.8 @ 91 from the '92 awd version i believe

There were four different trim levels of Eclipse for 1990, each offering its own mix of powertrains. At the base sat the plain Jane Eclipse with a 1.8-liter, SOHC, eight-valve four making just 90 hp, driving the front wheels through either a five-speed manual or four-speed automatic transmission. One step up was the Eclipse GS powered by a 2.0-liter, DOHC, 16-valve four making a much more satisfying 135 hp and available with the same transmissions. Adding a turbocharger to that motor resulted in 190 hp aboard the GS Turbo, which came only with the five-speed. At the top of the lineup was the GSX that took everything in the GS Turbo and added five more horses, all-wheel drive and a fully independent, multilink rear suspension to the equation.

With a curb weight of just 2,745 pounds and 190 hp, it was no surprise that Motor Trend's test GS Turbo was a speedy little thing. It ripped to 60 mph in just 7.4 seconds and completed the quarter-mile in 15.9 seconds at 90.3 mph. Not bad for a front-drive car in the early '90s.

The 1991 Eclipse was virtually indistinguishable from the '90 edition. However, antilock brakes and the automatic transmission were now options on the GS Turbo and GSX. Buyers could also get a limited-slip differential in the GSX, but had to forego the ABS brakes if they chose it.

For 1992 Mitsubishi swapped the Eclipse's pop-up headlights for a set of fixed lamps shaped like cat's eyes. There were also some changes to the spoiler and wheel designs, and both of the turbo engines were now rated at 195 hp, but otherwise the Eclipse was unchanged. Motor Trend drove a '92 GSX, concluding, "The GSX remains one of the all-time great buys in a performance sport coupe. The all-wheel-drive system is completely transparent, but can save you from some outrageous cases of brain fade." They measured the GSX steaming to 60 mph in 7 seconds and running the quarter-mile in 15.3 seconds at 89.2 mph.

ABS was made standard on the GSX for 1993 while the other Eclipses carried forward with minor visual tweaks such as a stand-alone rear spoiler on the GS. Time was catching up with the Eclipse, however, as a GSX finished fourth in a five-car comparison test run by Car and Driver (the then-new V6-powered Ford Probe GT won). "This year," the magazine wrote, "Mitsubishi has refined the brakes, adding larger discs and has improved the shifter action. The raft of changes makes working the potent turbocharged engine a sweeter prospect.

"Four years, though, is a lifetime in this highly competitive niche. The Eclipse's powertrain, for instance, gives up nothing to its larger displacement competitors in power or acceleration, but it can't match the newer four- and six-cylinder engines for smoothness or seamless power delivery…. Despite its intact performance figures, the Eclipse felt and looked like the elder statesman of this brat pack." For the record, Car and Driver had the GSX wailing to 60 mph in only 6.4 seconds and consuming the quarter-mile in 15 seconds at 88 mph.

With a new Eclipse on its way, the 1994 edition was basically the '93 with new vehicle identification numbers. Motor Trend's test of a '94 GSX had it running a 6.6-second 0-60 time and flashing through the quarter-mile in a scalding 14.8 seconds at 91.1 mph.

Could the next Eclipse match this first one's ability to enchant enthusiasts while attracting a wider audience?
_________________________
Swim->Bike->Cry
"I can see that nurses head bobbing around going "I AINT CANCELIN MUH PLANS, FUCK A CDC. WHO DEY ANYWAY NAH MEEN? IMA GO SEE MUH BOO" -johnso


Top
#3525977 - 03/02/09 09:33 AM Re: Euphoric [Re: danl]
FCobra94 Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 10/22/01
Posts: 19689
Loc: MD
 Originally Posted By: danl
You pretty much explained to me why your car pukes and dies. You don't want to listen so I won't try to help.

LOL! I was waiting for this reply...

Has a tune been posted for this mystery machine yet? Even with my limited tuning knowledge a fuel, timing, and boost table would be interesting to see on this fabled puke 'n die-er.
_________________________
'07 335i

Top
#3526898 - 03/02/09 01:27 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: FCobra94]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
have you ever seen a dyno? lol. driven one, own one? no, i do.
shit even danl's dynos are massive puke n die... torque ramps up peaks hard and then drops like mount everest. its like the reverse of a supra dyno.

you want to see a tune... its on the stock ecu.


88-91 traps.... hrmmm somehow danl got the factory freak that does an amazing 15.9 @ 99 mph ....

_________________________

Top
#3526921 - 03/02/09 01:32 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
SpcNA[ZX] Offline
Sr Member


Registered: 12/08/00
Posts: 1218
Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
You guys have to understand that once you drive a Civic Si(R) there's just no comparing anything to the massive and broad powerband of a stock B16... Where the power and torque steadily build as you progress upwards of 8k and you can almost begin to feel it!

Here's a dyno from a stock 1992 Eagle Talon TSi AWD. I can totally see where it just falls right off the graph...... If you try and drive it like an Si(R) \:\)


EDIT>>> And the accompanying article.


Edited by SpcNA[ZX] (03/02/09 01:47 PM)
_________________________
'92 Galant VR-4
'93 Nissan 300ZX

Top
#3527116 - 03/02/09 02:23 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: SpcNA[ZX]]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
My 1990 puke and die dyno graph Euphoric speaks of:

EDIT: Sorry about the 0.2 bump in the AFR (Brensi gave me shit for it and told me I couldn't tune). I don't have enough weight over the nose and it wasn't gripping the dyno causing a slight blip. Also it wouldn't hold boost, on the street it was over 35psi

Top
#3527143 - 03/02/09 02:31 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: danl]
SpcNA[ZX] Offline
Sr Member


Registered: 12/08/00
Posts: 1218
Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
How can you even drive that thing, can you shift fast enough before it pukes and dies?
_________________________
'92 Galant VR-4
'93 Nissan 300ZX

Top
#3527219 - 03/02/09 02:48 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: SpcNA[ZX]]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
Absolutely not. Its like wait for it............wait for it............bam...over.....shift...........can't..........get.........the........
next...........gear......damm.........diamondstar........ok off again....wait......

lol

Top
#3527434 - 03/02/09 03:42 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: danl]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
not the dyno i was talking about.... nice new dyno you are throwing up ..in which you have cams thrown in among other shit.
nice try though.

why not put up your old dyno with stock head/cams etc because thats obviously what im talking about...you can change anything with cams and headwork
_________________________

Top
#3527462 - 03/02/09 03:51 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
SpcNA[ZX] Offline
Sr Member


Registered: 12/08/00
Posts: 1218
Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
Which is why I posted one from a stock car \:\)
_________________________
'92 Galant VR-4
'93 Nissan 300ZX

Top
#3527517 - 03/02/09 04:07 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: SpcNA[ZX]]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
ya and it shows what ive been saying...
has nothing in the low revs and then it shits itself.

even the evo9 and 10 are similar... they are obviously better out of the box but they still shat themselves

_________________________

Top
#3527556 - 03/02/09 04:16 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
My evo 9 puke and die, even HARDER to drive than the DSM:

Top
#3527599 - 03/02/09 04:28 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: danl]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
who said anything about hard to drive? you guys sure love to make things up

and thats a hp curve, not torque
_________________________

Top
#3527632 - 03/02/09 04:38 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
Tach signal was dropping out. They don't like COP's apparently.

Top
#3527745 - 03/02/09 05:06 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
SpcNA[ZX] Offline
Sr Member


Registered: 12/08/00
Posts: 1218
Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
 Originally Posted By: Euphoric
ya and it shows what ive been saying...
has nothing in the low revs and then it shits itself.

It's not an electric motor, it will not have 100% IMMEDIATE torque and power right off the bat and though it should be noted that you said torque AND stock b16 in the same thread, hilarious \:D

Here's a stock and "tuned" 1999 Civic Si dyno.


For reference we'll compare the stock talon dyno and the stock Civic Si(R) dyno that I found on hondata's website in increments \:\)



As you can see the Talon clearly outperforms the civic across the entire range which is to be expected since it's a 2.0l turbocharged powerplant. I would argue however that it does not simply "puke and die" as you have stated. It does fall off a bit but the car is stock and was probably made that way for better low/mid response like most production vehicles.Your statement that the B16 has more nuts under 4 or 5k is incorrect, and your statement that it pukes and dies is also incorrect really. I mean if anything it just falls off to near (but still better than) b16 power \:\) That is if you consider +29whp to be close anyway.


Edited by SpcNA[ZX] (03/02/09 05:15 PM)
_________________________
'92 Galant VR-4
'93 Nissan 300ZX

Top
#3527843 - 03/02/09 05:23 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: SpcNA[ZX]]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
your numbers are wrong/off... some simple calcs and looking at the graphs pts this out... (hp = tq*rpm/5252)

also the b16 has shorter gears and is n/a and in a lighter car. out of boost the dsm is a dog in comparison. i know you only have two dsms...but i have both cars in question. right now. i drive them back to back lots. i know wtf im saying.

do you drive them back to back? ... ... ... oh thats right you dont

nice ninja edit: the part where you said they are the same speed...(fwd vs fwd)... which is wtf ive been saying. awd only has a faster time because of the launch. trap speeds are similar. (meaning they accel at the same rate).
its hilarious how butt hurt you are.
_________________________

Top
#3527888 - 03/02/09 05:31 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
SpcNA[ZX] Offline
Sr Member


Registered: 12/08/00
Posts: 1218
Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
What's all this "driving out of boost" mess you keep talking about? Most 14b (stock) powered cars get full boost around 3k or less and still make more hp WHILE BUILDING boost than a stock B16. I posted two legitimate dyno's from hondata and a magazine that has no vested interest in the DSM which clearly show the the DSM is more powerful across pretty much the entire powerband.

The Si is indeed geared more aggressively but it pretty much has to be able to move itself. The power numbers speak for themselves! The Talon has more hp and torque (by quite a bit actually) across the board. Granted it's in a heavier car but also a faster car. Maybe it "feels" like a dog because it's not "zing zing brrrrrrrrrring de zinging" like you enjoy but it's still moving \:\) That's great that you own both, but it sounds like one of your cars needs a tune-up! At any rate I won't disagree that maybe YOUR talon is a dog compared to YOUR civic which.... Is your civic stock?


Edited by SpcNA[ZX] (03/02/09 05:34 PM)
_________________________
'92 Galant VR-4
'93 Nissan 300ZX

Top
#3527955 - 03/02/09 05:43 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: Euphoricuck]
cliff st-clair Offline
Post Master Sr


Registered: 01/03/00
Posts: 6376
Loc: Queens Village, NY
Euphoria, at low rpms there isn't a thing the B16 is better than. Yeah I agree it holds power better than the 4g in stock form but the 4g makes more power anyway so that is really a moot point. yeah I know power to weight comes into play, but come on, stock vs stock the eclipse was a faster car. I know because I raced stock ones back in the day when I had my Si. They weren't much faster, but they were about 2-3 car lengths faster.
Only in your world can the b16 si run with cars that were a good bit faster back in the days:
You have claimed the Si is as fast as GSR. That is not true.
You have claimed the Si is as fast as Prelude. That is not true.

From what I can recall you are 0 for 3 once it comes to what cars the Si was faster...no, less slow than or as slow as. But wait, last time I checked your Si doesn't even have a b16 anymore because you blew it up and have some kind of b18 now.

Jeez man, you should keep yourself from talking about Hondas really. Your bias is so blatant it is bordering on the unbearable.
_________________________
03' 350z
04' Mazda 3 s

Top
#3527985 - 03/02/09 05:51 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: SpcNA[ZX]]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
 Originally Posted By: SpcNA[ZX
]What's all this "driving out of boost" mess you keep talking about? Most 14b (stock) powered cars get full boost around 3k or less and still make more hp WHILE BUILDING boost than a stock B16. I posted two legitimate dyno's from hondata and a magazine that has no vested interest in the DSM which clearly show the the DSM is more powerful across pretty much the entire powerband.
and i pointed out your little calcs are off and misleading.
i also dont go wot all over the place...do you? off a light its a nice normal accel and the car doesnt really do well. if i do go 1/2 throttle or more it doesnt really move till 4k rpm. which is supported by your stock dsm dyno graph.
then it hits the nice wave of torch...if you keep going itll pull nicely till 6kish and then fall on its face.
 Quote:


The Si is indeed geared more aggressively but it pretty much has to be able to move itself.

not really, look at civic dx gear ratios.... they still manage to move...though not that quick..

 Quote:
The power numbers speak for themselves! The Talon has more hp and torque (by quite a bit actually) across the board. Granted it's in a heavier car but also a faster car.

heavier , less aggressively geared, lower compression... doesnt have the response even a little n/a motor has. sorry it just doesnt. its also not faster , you even said it yourself(but you ninja edited it out, ya i saw it)

 Quote:

Maybe it "feels" like a dog because it's not "zing zing brrrrrrrrrring de zinging" like you enjoy but it's still moving \:\) That's great that you own both, but it sounds like one of your cars needs a tune-up! At any rate I won't disagree that maybe YOUR talon is a dog compared to YOUR civic which.... Is your civic stock?

the talon runs well, you have no idea whats been done to it or the care that has been taken with it.

my civic has i/h/e.

i live in a world were stock dsms run 15's ..and shit so do I. modded changes it for anything. but it still doesnt take away from a heavier car, with less agressive gearing and less compression is not going to be as responsive booting around town(1-4k rpm) as an n/a motor...i know its hard for you to grasp, but i drive them everyday.

from a roll btw, the talon barely pulls my civic(my dsm isnt bone stock), obviously out of the hole its gone lol awd.
_________________________

Top
#3528002 - 03/02/09 05:57 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: cliff st-clair]
Euphoricuck Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 11/05/03
Posts: 92703
Loc: Canadistan
obviously power/weight (among other things) comes into play. nowehre did I say the 4g makes less power ...its rated at 195 from the factory ...no shit it makes more power .
I said its a dog out of boost and pretty much below 4k rpm compared to the b16(which is it). as i said i know its hard for you guys to accept it and blah blah b16 torque yada yada. i drive these two cars back to back all the time. im the only fucking one in here to do it. ive been driving both of them for yearssss, both in various states of tunes and mods. i know wtf is up.

if you think an Si cant run with a gsr or prelude, you have smoked yourself retarded.

you ran a mystical 14.7 with bolts on man... plenty enough to roast gsr's or ludes.
_________________________

Top
#3528043 - 03/02/09 06:10 PM Re: Euphoric [Re: SpcNA[ZX]]
danl Offline
Post Master Supreme


Registered: 07/14/00
Posts: 12515
Loc: Maryland USA
 Originally Posted By: SpcNA[ZX
] That's great that you own both, but it sounds like one of your cars needs a tune-up! At any rate I won't disagree that maybe YOUR talon is a dog compared to YOUR civic which.... Is your civic stock?


His talon has an evo 3 16g. He said that from a roll the talon barley pulls the civic. Something ain't right. Evo 3 16g cars go 110mph easy all day long. I mean fuck I went 122mph on a 14b, the average car should be able to trap 110 on an evo 3 16g!

Top
Page 2 of 5 <12345>


Moderator:  auxilary, Professor Paki 
Hop to:
Shout Box

CSi Sponsors

DiGBiC Lighters
DiGBiC Lighters
DallasColo
Dallas Colocation
ClubSi.com Shirts
ClubSi-Shirts
GameStop
Black-Friday Specials
Big Brake Kits
StopTech.Sale BBK Clearance
Brake Kits
Buy Brake Kits
EBC Brake Kits
EBC Brake Kits
BuyBrakes
Brake Kits-Pads & Rotors Sets
StopTech Brake Kits
StopTech
StopTech NZ
StopTech
StopTech Australia
StopTech
Hawk Brake Pads
Hawk Brake Pads
Samys Camera
GoPros, Cameras, Gear
Brake Specials Near Me
Brake Specials Near Me
Brake Pad Coupons
Coupon Code "hondafetish"
Porsche Brakes
Porsche Brake Upgrades
2-Piece Rotors-Civic Type-R
2-Piece Civic Rotors
Advertisement

| Brake Pads | | How To Change Brake Pads | | Drilled Slotted Brake Kits Cheap | EBC Brake Kits | Performance Brake Kits | Brake Specials Near Me | How To Replace Brake Pads