|
|
|||||||
I'm thinking of getting a CUV next (Compact SUV). I just need more room and AWD. Got caught on a ski hill in Quebec where I couldn't climb the hill to the chalet. So no more FWD, i want AWD. I also need more room to put my S-works stumpjumper in. My last bike was stolen right off the bike rack. The G/F now has a MTB as well so a larger luggage compartment is needed. Most of the usage will be on-road but every so often I'll need to climb snow covered gravel roads going up mountains. My list is pretty long right now and i need to narrow it down. But I don't know a lot about CUVs. List: - Honda CRV touring - Hyundai Tucson Ultimate or Santa-fe sport 2.0T limited - Ford Escape titanium or Edge titanium - Nissan rogue - Mazda CX-5 Luxury CUVs, but i don't really care about the brands or luxury unless they're really better than those above. - Lexus NX - Acura RDX - BMW X3 - Audi Q5. I'm not sure I'd want an audi right now considering what's happening to the VW group right now. - Range Rover Evoque. Cute but may be to "feminin". Also heard they have tons of problems. So far I'm leaning towards the CRV the most but i haven't taken a good look at a lot of the others on the list. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Santa-fe sport are nice. I don't think you can wrong with any of them though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Tucson is smaller than the Santa-Fe.. I've sat in one, huge trunk. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Not sure if I can take OP seriously after his last post about "doing something" and his name. Here he lists every single CUV ranged from $20k to 60k. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The new Lincoln MK C looks nice in a dark colour It's the end of the year too so there are probably deals http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1081...how-live-photos FYI land rovers and range rovers do have tons of problems and always have. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: porschetr Not sure if I can take OP seriously after his last post about "doing something" and his name. Here he lists every single CUV ranged from $20k to 60k. I don't really care that much about the over $50K CUVs but if they're waaaaay better in every way possible, then yes, i would dish out the extra bucks. I thought i already mentioned that. One reason I'm asking for help is because I'm trying to quickly narrow down the list in the hopes of getting a deal on an outgoing 2015 model before the 2016s get here. Well, except for the Tucson which is a 2016 but that redesign is really nice and I wouldn't want a 2015 model. If you doubt my sincerity, that's ok, but i'd prefer you contribute something constructive to this thread rather than trying to derail it. Thanks |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: JEFFOS The new Lincoln MK C looks nice in a dark colour It's the end of the year too so there are probably deals http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1081...how-live-photos FYI land rovers and range rovers do have tons of problems and always have. Nice. Didn't even think about that one. But except for the luxury, is it really any better than the Escape? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: furball Tucson is smaller than the Santa-Fe.. I've sat in one, huge trunk. I'm looking at it on the website and it seems to be pretty much in line with what i need right now. I'm sure 2 MTBs fit in that trunk... no problem! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
You'd get really good deasl from 2015 Lincoln MKX and 2015 Lexus RX350. Both are redesigned for 2016 and they want to get rid of old stocks. The 2016 MKX is on sale now and the RX is coming soon. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: porschetr You'd get really good deasl from 2015 Lincoln MKX and 2015 Lexus RX350. Both are redesigned for 2016 and they want to get rid of old stocks. The 2016 MKX is on sale now and the RX is coming soon. i think they're both a bit too big. If I were to check out Lincoln or Lexus, the MKC and NX would probably be what suits me most. But you got me thinking. If i'm putting the CRV and Tucson in my list, maybe the RAV4 too? Wow... narrowing down this list is going to be hard. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Just A Troll Originally Posted By: JEFFOS The new Lincoln MK C looks nice in a dark colour It's the end of the year too so there are probably deals http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1081...how-live-photos FYI land rovers and range rovers do have tons of problems and always have. Nice. Didn't even think about that one. But except for the luxury, is it really any better than the Escape? Yeah it really is - it's based off the escape but it's more than just bolting on some parts. Seen a few in real life on the roads and they catch my eye - the shape is better than the escape for sure This is from what I hear though but I haven't done a ton of research into it. It should also have sync3 which is pretty sweet from what I've seen As with anything to see the real difference you need to go with the top end with the best drivetrajn |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I really like - Honda CRV touring and Hyundai Santa-fe sport 2.0T limited. They both are solid CUV. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Im pretty happy with my most recent purchase. Looked at a Santa Fe and Tucson. Santa Fe is pushing time for a redesign and the Tucson was pretty nice, but I didnt like the interior and it was kinda lackluster to drive. Sis in laws has a new CX5 and she really likes it. Handles and drives real nice for a small CUV. Luxury ones the RDX is a clear winner for me. The NX lacks alot of things that are standard or not available with the RDX. The others were all pretty expensive when optioned up. Any specific questions about the RDX Id be happy to answer. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Rdx is good bang for the buck, just check out which trim level fits your budget and need. Lexus as usual seems to sell very well. We have a 15 crv EX, wife loves it, great vehicle. Both of these will have high residual value if u ever plan for trade in. Hyundai has done a nice job on their units, definitely a contender these days. Toyota same as crv. But uglier haha. The Ford edge seems decent and sells very well. Worth a look. Mazda seems to do ok and sell well for what it is, we drove it nd most guys liked it. not a fan of the Nissan. Lincoln is something different to consider but eiiihh. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I would pick Honda CR-V for basic A to B transportation. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
what does the current situation with VW have to do with whether or not you want a Q5? do you no longer trust the brand? and it's technologies? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Dumbass Im pretty happy with my most recent purchase. Looked at a Santa Fe and Tucson. Santa Fe is pushing time for a redesign and the Tucson was pretty nice, but I didnt like the interior and it was kinda lackluster to drive. Sis in laws has a new CX5 and she really likes it. Handles and drives real nice for a small CUV. Luxury ones the RDX is a clear winner for me. The NX lacks alot of things that are standard or not available with the RDX. The others were all pretty expensive when optioned up. Any specific questions about the RDX Id be happy to answer. How's the engine/transmision on the RDX? A 3.5L V6 is going to have quite a bit of power but is it smooth and not too bad on gas? Does it have low RPM vibration or roughness? Some older Acuras with V6 and automatics had drivetrain noises and other issues. I like the price vs equipment of the Tech model. The trend is mostly towards turbo 4 bangers in CUVs so i'm not too sure about a V6. This review is ok but not spectacular: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakTec6q8JA Being an owner, do you agree with his points? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: TheRealCSnapper what does the current situation with VW have to do with whether or not you want a Q5? do you no longer trust the brand? and it's technologies? Since Audi/VW has taken a hell of a black eye, their entire range has been affected, or more accurately... their brand name is taking a hit. They're probably going to start offering incentives or be a lot more open to negotiation so they can get customers back. Problem is, the VW "crisis" isn't over so there may be a lot more incentive in the near future which I may not be willing to wait for. So unless I can get some price protection against near future drops, I'd hate to get a Q5 only to see it drop a few thousand in say... 3 months. There's just too much uncertainty right now. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Screamin DC2R We have a 15 crv EX, wife loves it, great vehicle. Any info on this vibration issue I keep reading about? Something about the CVT when revving below 2500rpms. Did you notice this? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Just A Troll Originally Posted By: Dumbass Im pretty happy with my most recent purchase. Looked at a Santa Fe and Tucson. Santa Fe is pushing time for a redesign and the Tucson was pretty nice, but I didnt like the interior and it was kinda lackluster to drive. Sis in laws has a new CX5 and she really likes it. Handles and drives real nice for a small CUV. Luxury ones the RDX is a clear winner for me. The NX lacks alot of things that are standard or not available with the RDX. The others were all pretty expensive when optioned up. Any specific questions about the RDX Id be happy to answer. How's the engine/transmision on the RDX? A 3.5L V6 is going to have quite a bit of power but is it smooth and not too bad on gas? Does it have low RPM vibration or roughness? Some older Acuras with V6 and automatics had drivetrain noises and other issues. I like the price vs equipment of the Tech model. The trend is mostly towards turbo 4 bangers in CUVs so i'm not too sure about a V6. This review is ok but not spectacular: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakTec6q8JA Being an owner, do you agree with his points? Ummm, the guy in the video gave it A+, A, A- and B+'s across the board, not sure what else you want?? lol 'just ok'? that's pretty good is it not? what did the guy rate other cars? anyways, i've driven a few trims more than a few times, nice truck overall. i'd call it more an SUV now than CUV as it's big. has some minor pests here and there but overall it's a nice drive. new chassis and motor vs. the older acura models. they get better mileage out of a V6 than their 4-turbo lol, the old engine was a guzzler ugh. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Engine and trans is smooth on the RDX, it's good on gas if you don't have a lead foot. powerful v6, very quiet inside. there's a reason acura is killing the SUV sales right now. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: titty sprinkles Engine and trans is smooth on the RDX, it's good on gas if you don't have a lead foot. powerful v6, very quiet inside. there's a reason acura is killing the SUV sales right now. *cue hatorade for saying otherwise* |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: titty sprinkles there's a reason acura is killing the SUV sales right now. I'm too sure about that last statement. The most common CUVs I see around are the CRV and Santa Fe. Maybe it's just because I'm looking for those but I rarely see RDX. I see more MDX though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Ruled out GLK. rear seat is way too cramped and the trunk doesn't seem big enough for 2 MTBs. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
That was one of the reviews that started to sell me on it. I also liked this one, although the cons he lists at the end I dont exactly agree with. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXhN8JVDyrQ The 3.5/6at in the RDX combo is very smooth. More so then the 3.5GDI/9at in my TLX I think. The GDI is more powerful but its a tad bit noisier and the 9at has had complaints that hunts through the gears. I drive in manual mode most of the time so it doesnt bother me. Cant be the reliability of a NA either and prob less maintenance then a turbo too. Ive never been an SUV owner, this being my first and I really like it. I drives like a tall car really, not sloppy like a truck or bigger SUV. I doenst feel large either. My wife and I both got used to its size real quick. Lots of glass area and its easy to see out of. The technology/options, stereo, Acurawatch, space inside is all great. According the display, Im seeing about 8.5-9L/100km, so its prob close to 10 real world. Takes regular gas too. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
new tucson looks good to me but havent been in or driven one. rdx is great. buddy has a 2015 and its very nice. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: titty sprinkles Engine and trans is smooth on the RDX, it's good on gas if you don't have a lead foot. powerful v6, very quiet inside. there's a reason acura is killing the SUV sales right now. Killing SUV sales? Is this fanboi talk or real talk? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Why not just get a CRV. Having it in the list says you don't care about luxurious options. What do you mean by "better"? Do you want heated steering wheels? 0-60? Large cargo space? Reliability? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
What about the new Tesla Model X? http://youtu.be/RUz_EXSmp9w The door feature is pretty cool. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
I'd start with narrowing down the choices by trying to fit the list of stuff you must put inside each vehicle (even loading on the rack, if applicable). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
AND THE WINNER IS... 2016 Acura RDX Tech Thank you Dumbass, Screamin and Titty spinkles for all your advice. It came down to the RDX and the CRV. But coming from a civic Si, the CRV was just too slow. Don't get me wrong, I really liked a lot of things about it. It's just my driving style is a bit more about passing power, quickly merging into traffic and so on. I guess if I didn't try the 2.0T offerings, or the RDX, I probably would've picked the CRV. The Tucson 1.6T was quickly dismissed. It has lots of cargo room but it's really weak. That 1.6 engine has got no guts so I don't really trust this thing to climb ski hills and such. The materials felt really cheap compared to the CRV. The Ford Escape was a no from the start because it's really too small. The Edge, really too big! The Toyota RAV4 just feels old. It's just recently redisgned and it's just too bland. Personal feeling I guess. When I looked at the luxury brands, I dismissed the GLK because of the rear room (passenger space and trunk). The Audi was a pretty good pick, I liked that one too. The X3 was pretty nice as well, until I read reviews with people complaining about all sorts of quality issues. Especially that turboed engine. The Lexus NX is pretty, good size except for the trunk which probably won't accomodate 2 MTBs with 29" wheels. The RDX was the winner based on my needs, my driving style and value. For the dollar, very few other CUVs came close. The Q5 and X3 are still ridiculousy over-priced. I got a good offer for a 2016 RDX tech in silver with black leather. Now that I've decided, I'll have to sit down with the dealer and try to negotiate just a bit more and see if we can agree on pricing and perhaps a few accessories thrown in. Anyway guys, thanks for your oppinions and comments, they really were helpful. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Good choice. I looked at the NX too, but once you optioned it comparable to the RDX, it was $50k+. Same feelings about the Tucson, too slow and the interior materials were kinda cheapo. But for the price, it really had some advanced features for a Hyundai and I thought it looked great. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Just A Troll AND THE WINNER IS... 2016 Acura RDX Tech Thank you Dumbass, Screamin and Titty spinkles for all your advice. It came down to the RDX and the CRV. But coming from a civic Si, the CRV was just too slow. Don't get me wrong, I really liked a lot of things about it. It's just my driving style is a bit more about passing power, quickly merging into traffic and so on. I guess if I didn't try the 2.0T offerings, or the RDX, I probably would've picked the CRV. The Tucson 1.6T was quickly dismissed. It has lots of cargo room but it's really weak. That 1.6 engine has got no guts so I don't really trust this thing to climb ski hills and such. The materials felt really cheap compared to the CRV. The Ford Escape was a no from the start because it's really too small. The Edge, really too big! The Toyota RAV4 just feels old. It's just recently redisgned and it's just too bland. Personal feeling I guess. When I looked at the luxury brands, I dismissed the GLK because of the rear room (passenger space and trunk). The Audi was a pretty good pick, I liked that one too. The X3 was pretty nice as well, until I read reviews with people complaining about all sorts of quality issues. Especially that turboed engine. The Lexus NX is pretty, good size except for the trunk which probably won't accomodate 2 MTBs with 29" wheels. The RDX was the winner based on my needs, my driving style and value. For the dollar, very few other CUVs came close. The Q5 and X3 are still ridiculousy over-priced. I got a good offer for a 2016 RDX tech in silver with black leather. Now that I've decided, I'll have to sit down with the dealer and try to negotiate just a bit more and see if we can agree on pricing and perhaps a few accessories thrown in. Anyway guys, thanks for your oppinions and comments, they really were helpful. excellent choice - although be prepared for hatorade chewing your ass out w/ his anti acura remarks. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Just curious, what kind of discounting has Acura been willing to do for you so far? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Why no SQ5, I'm sure Audi is willing to Deal at this point |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
For me, I got 2% off the rate, only $500 off the RDX, but they gave me way more for my trade in then they should have. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Good call. But yes his analysis result is what a lot of ppl eventually come to :P |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
OP did you look at the Santa Fe Sport before deciding? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: spd-dmn OP did you look at the Santa Fe Sport before deciding? Yup. And now that I think about it, my mistake was to start with Hyundai. I thought the Santa Fe was a bit too big compared to the Tucson. But that's because they were both side by side in the showroom. I think the Santa Fe and RDX are just about the same size, the 2.0T is about the same power and once equipped with the Limited trim, probably have close to the same equipment. At this level, the Santa Fe is just slightly below a RDX tech in terms of pricing. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: spd-dmn Just curious, what kind of discounting has Acura been willing to do for you so far? Lease? Cash? Finance? Which one do you want to know? I got $52K (out the door) cash price. I'll be working on dropping it below the $50K mark. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
What was your trade and what you get for it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Hatorade Originally Posted By: titty sprinkles Engine and trans is smooth on the RDX, it's good on gas if you don't have a lead foot. powerful v6, very quiet inside. there's a reason acura is killing the SUV sales right now. Killing SUV sales? Is this fanboi talk or real talk? Actually yes, but thanks for coming out. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20...06#.VhKG5flVhBc September 2015 Highlights: Canadian-built Honda CR-V rolled on to its fourth straight monthly record and the fifth in six months, posting a 27% gain on sales of 3,746 units. Honda Pilot sales rose 97% in September with 951 units sold, breaking a monthly sales record for the sixth consecutive month. Acura sales growth was led by the success of TLX at 647 units sold, a year-over-year increase of 70% Acura RDX continued its gains, jumping 31% on 637 units sold, setting a fifth consecutive monthly record and apparently there's already a shitload of 2016 Civic sedan pre-orders ready to go. the TLX number is a bit skewed though since "70%" rise...really they didn't sell a lot at the start and the car wasn't around before lol. that lexus NX i know sold lots as well (new model/redesign so that's a given) and it looks great. they could tone down the GIANT lexus shark mouth a bit though lol. though we must remember zeeGerman SUV/CUV's are i think considered more a luxo brand so of course you won't see the volumes vs. the japcrap and us makes/models (Canada wide I'm talking). we're just so used to seeing them here because GTA money. ford escape still sells a boatload every month in Canada it's nuts (i think almost 1000 units above the crv on avg and the rav??). but, don't forget the vehicles bought by gov and business' for usage as those make up a nice chunk of sales too (not just your avg. joe customer buying). hyundai is making a dent but honestly they're not "there" yet... also when new models launch companies usually give big incentives (public and to employees of the company) to either buy the outgoing model on a crazy discount or give something towards trading into the newer model to boost sales. the factories care more about wholesaled units vs. retailed units really. oh...new Ridgeline coming soon too (finally!), it looks pretty badass. long overdue. not sure if it'll be unibody or not. hrv's seem to be selling out quick too. all in all (for honda and many other corp's) we're just one big reselling company in Canada lol. the USA is 10x the sales on every model, we're just a flea re. sales figures vs. them. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
^^^ still impressive considering our pop is < state of cali |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Just A Troll Originally Posted By: spd-dmn OP did you look at the Santa Fe Sport before deciding? Yup. And now that I think about it, my mistake was to start with Hyundai. I thought the Santa Fe was a bit too big compared to the Tucson. But that's because they were both side by side in the showroom. I think the Santa Fe and RDX are just about the same size, the 2.0T is about the same power and once equipped with the Limited trim, probably have close to the same equipment. At this level, the Santa Fe is just slightly below a RDX tech in terms of pricing. Agree with you on everything except price. I think the Santa Fe is still like 7k less. Screamin is right tho, ever since the V6 and the facelift, the RDX has been super hot in the market. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: spd-dmn Originally Posted By: Just A Troll Originally Posted By: spd-dmn OP did you look at the Santa Fe Sport before deciding? Yup. And now that I think about it, my mistake was to start with Hyundai. I thought the Santa Fe was a bit too big compared to the Tucson. But that's because they were both side by side in the showroom. I think the Santa Fe and RDX are just about the same size, the 2.0T is about the same power and once equipped with the Limited trim, probably have close to the same equipment. At this level, the Santa Fe is just slightly below a RDX tech in terms of pricing. Agree with you on everything except price. I think the Santa Fe is still like 7k less. Screamin is right tho, ever since the V6 and the facelift, the RDX has been super hot in the market. "just below" is a relative term. From the MSRP it's $40,549 for 2016 Santa Fe 2.0T limited and $44,990 for 2016 RDX Tech. $4k is quite a bit of money, but to me the RDX is indeed worth it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The RDX does also come with a few things the Santa Fe doesnt too. Plus IMO it just drives nicer. The Santa Fe drives like an SUV, the RDX drives and feels like a tall car. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Just A Troll AND THE WINNER IS... 2016 Acura RDX Tech Thank you Dumbass, Screamin and Titty spinkles for all your advice. It came down to the RDX and the CRV. But coming from a civic Si, the CRV was just too slow. Don't get me wrong, I really liked a lot of things about it. It's just my driving style is a bit more about passing power, quickly merging into traffic and so on. I guess if I didn't try the 2.0T offerings, or the RDX, I probably would've picked the CRV. The Tucson 1.6T was quickly dismissed. It has lots of cargo room but it's really weak. That 1.6 engine has got no guts so I don't really trust this thing to climb ski hills and such. The materials felt really cheap compared to the CRV. The Ford Escape was a no from the start because it's really too small. The Edge, really too big! The Toyota RAV4 just feels old. It's just recently redisgned and it's just too bland. Personal feeling I guess. When I looked at the luxury brands, I dismissed the GLK because of the rear room (passenger space and trunk). The Audi was a pretty good pick, I liked that one too. The X3 was pretty nice as well, until I read reviews with people complaining about all sorts of quality issues. Especially that turboed engine. The Lexus NX is pretty, good size except for the trunk which probably won't accomodate 2 MTBs with 29" wheels. The RDX was the winner based on my needs, my driving style and value. For the dollar, very few other CUVs came close. The Q5 and X3 are still ridiculousy over-priced. I got a good offer for a 2016 RDX tech in silver with black leather. Now that I've decided, I'll have to sit down with the dealer and try to negotiate just a bit more and see if we can agree on pricing and perhaps a few accessories thrown in. Anyway guys, thanks for your oppinions and comments, they really were helpful. hey hatorade |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Chocolate Canuck Why no SQ5, I'm sure Audi is willing to Deal at this point Nope. They weren't really wiling to deal. Sure some discounts, not even worth it. And I'm not too sure of the ergonomics. That navi is a bit confusing to use. The rear room is decent, better than the NX but not quite RDX. The Q5's trunk is too narrow. I'm sure my 29er MTB will have a hard time fitting in there. It's also lacking some features the RDX has, like lane keep assist. By the time you equipe it closely to the RDX, it's basically $10K more... at least! So as far as value goes, you get more with the RDX. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: A2B-Lexus What was your trade and what you get for it? I negotiate the price of the RDX separately than the trade in. I don't want the guy playing the numbers on me. Basically, i'm in control of the negotiation. Guy called me, told me to come in so we can work something out with the manager. I'll pop buy tomorrow. I may be driving this thing by the end of the week. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
BOUGHT IT! Signed for a 2016 RDX tech in silver. Had the dealer throw in the cargo cover, cargo tray and all weather mats. Out the door (taxes, freight, a/c, environ etc.) cash price: $48.5K. I'll be getting it sometime next week. The silver one on the lot was sold this morning just a few hours before I went. So they have to go to their depot lot to fetch mine and prep it up. It seems the RDX is indeed a hot seller. Just as I was working out the details with the business manager, my sales rep sold a white one to a couple with one child. All the ones on the lot were already sold, except for the 3 demos that were very busy today. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
nice congrats. yeah they sell plenty here (though not sure how lean they run in terms of in stock units), it`ll retain its value very well too. wait until you get to try out the sh-awd in the snow (esp if you get snows on it), just unstoppable. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Screamin DC2R wait until you get to try out the sh-awd in the snow (esp if you get snows on it), just unstoppable. ??? We don't get the sh-awd on the 2016 RDX, just an "intelligent" AWD system. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Yeah, no SH-AWD. Ive already ordered my winters from SimplyTire and Tires23 has good pricing on WeatherTech mats too. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Sorry was thinking mdx |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Finally arrived. Still playing around with all the computer settings and such. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Wow those wheels are GROSS. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Looks good in the silver. The screens take some time getting used to, but I found the RDX pretty simple compared to my TLX. Only real frustrating part is that lots of the NAVI functions dont work when the car is in motion. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The Audio UI seems to have been written by a whole different team that the Navi, Phone and Info modules. There's a few things that I would've done differently but nothing that's a deal breaker. Most of it is just going to be about getting used to it. For my needs the tech RDX is pretty damn close. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Looks good, did you get some winter tires with the deal or going with the all seasons for this round? Let's see some interior shots. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Ewww, what with all the LEDs. Couldn't they just use two like BMW/Mercedes? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Chocolate Canuck Ewww, what with all the LEDs. Couldn't they just use two like BMW/Mercedes? Its a middle class thing. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
It looks better than before, but the beak is still ugly. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Acura just get cant get the fugly out. Always said those stupid jewel headlights are fucking gross. Goes with the beak I suppose. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
The ILX with the new LED lights look kinda nice. That would have been the cheaper choice if I didn't get the Toyota. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
A matter of opinion I guess but I love the looks of the jewel eyes. At least there's change. BMW is still stuck with the 4 round headlight looks just like in the '80s. And that twin kidney grill... it just keeps getting fatter and fatter. The "beak" though? Yeah, it could use some work. But compared to the previous generation, this one looks much better. Overall, I really like the front end on this thing. It's more TLX than MDX... ie. more aggressive. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Chocolate Canuck Ewww, what with all the LEDs. Couldn't they just use two like BMW/Mercedes? You mean the 4 round light with angel eyes that look barely evolved from the early 2000's? One reason I got the 2016 was for those LED headlights. It's thoroughly modern and they really do work. Compared to my Si, these LEDs light up everything very clearly, very far away. It was funny seeing my turn signals lighting up the rim around stop lights, road signs etc. from so far away. The guy in front me had his turn signals on too and mine just overpowered his. NICE! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Hatorade Wow those wheels are GROSS. Factory wheels are never the prettiest. Even the X3's are kinda bland. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Nothing like the old GSR / SiR wheels. The good old days! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Hatorade Wow those wheels are GROSS. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Just A Troll Originally Posted By: Hatorade Wow those wheels are GROSS. Factory wheels are never the prettiest. Even the X3's are kinda bland. Not sure why the X3 is even brought up when I specifically said the wheels are gross on the RDX. Or is that just a fail troll attempt? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
CR-V has that ugly wheels design too http://honda.ca/crv |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
like i said before honda needs to fire their wheel designer. but it's just wheels, easy to fix: |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Fix that damn beak!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
the beak isn't bad. the beak on the previous gen TL, mdx and tsx was terrible lol |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
ummm every car maker is doing those stupid style rims now i like the new jewel eye, at least at night anyways, look good and spread the light out nicely, great view distance. i (and others have commented) they're easier on the eyes re. the car oncoming towards you as it's not just one huge ass beam...rather broken up which your eye/brain process differently (so they say). beaks have toned down but yeah they could clean them up a bit more. ive seen some paint-matched ones done with a slight silver line and they look good. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: titty sprinkles like i said before honda needs to fire their wheel designer. but it's just wheels, easy to fix: That looks good - needs a beak fix though |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Originally Posted By: Hatorade Fix that damn beak!!! word. a nice black mesh would be just fine. like the the ek sir grille. |